Why the Google Home Speaker still waits on Gemini

The $99.99 Google Home Speaker is a strong return to smart speaker hardware, with appealing design, good sound for its size, and support for Matter and Thread. The weaker part is Gemini for Home, which shows promise in conversation but is described as slow, unreliable, and not yet a clear reason to upgrade.

WTF Index IDIOCRACY
◄ Terminator 0 Idiocracy 1 ►

The story mildly leans toward Idiocracy because the AI assistant is framed as unreliable and not yet improving the user experience, but it is mostly a routine product review.

Why the Google Home Speaker still waits on Gemini

The Google Home Speaker arrives with a clear promise: give Google’s smart home lineup a fresh hardware anchor built for Gemini. The device largely delivers on the physical product, but the assistant experience does not yet match the ambition around it.

That tension defines the speaker. It is attractive, compact, and useful as a home audio device, while Gemini for Home still feels like software waiting to catch up.

A smart speaker with a stronger hardware case

The $99.99 Google Home Speaker is Google’s first new smart speaker in six years and its first model described as “built for Gemini.” As hardware, it makes a persuasive first impression because it fits the role smart speakers are often asked to play: always present, useful in several rooms, and not visually demanding.

The speaker is small enough for a bedside table, kitchen counter, or a pair under a TV. Its soft green jade color is described as blending into a room without becoming bland, though the cable is not color-matched. The wall brick uses USB-C, but the cable is not removable from the speaker, which limits flexibility for longer cable runs or future wear.

The design avoids visible controls on the mesh fabric-covered body. Instead, touch controls are hidden into the top and sides: the top can stop or start audio or silence the assistant, while the sides adjust volume. A light ring around the base signals activity and can be turned off in settings, a useful option when the speaker sits in a dark room near a TV.

Sound that works well, with limits

For its softball size, the Google Home Speaker sounds good. It is strong enough for music and podcasts, and two units paired in stereo make a notable difference. At 80 percent volume, playback was clear, crisp, and loud enough to fill a house.

The trade-off is bass. Compared with the Nest Audio, which was also priced at $99.99, the new Home Speaker does not sound as full. The older Nest Audio had both a woofer and a tweeter, while the Home Speaker uses a single driver. The smaller body helps it fit more places, but the low end is thinner.

Against the $99.99 Echo Dot Max and the now pricier $129 HomePod Mini, the Home Speaker was judged a close third on audio quality. It is loud and clear, with decent mids and vocals, but the bass falls short. That weakness is not unusual for speakers this size, but it matters if music is the main reason to buy one.

The speaker also adds a useful Google TV feature. It can pair with a Google TV Streamer as an audio output, and using two speakers enables simulated spatial audio. YouTube playback worked well, and voices came through clearly. But the setup only works for content played through the Streamer; switching to another HDMI input moves audio away from the Home Speaker.

Better smart home hardware support

The Home Speaker is not only an audio product. It can act as a Matter controller, which means it can add and control Matter devices through Google Home. It is also the first Google Home audio speaker that can act as a Thread border router.

For now, it is on Thread 1.3. Google said it is working on supporting Thread 1.4, which is intended to help Thread border routers from different manufacturers work together more easily.

The speaker’s listening hardware also matters. It has three far-field microphones and a neural processing unit that handles background noise. In testing, it heard commands from across the room and while playing loud music. It was more responsive than the HomePod Mini, though slightly less responsive than the Echo Dot Max.

Gemini for Home is the unfinished part

The main reason to be cautious is not the speaker itself. It is Gemini for Home, Google’s smart home voice assistant powered by Gemini models. The assistant is meant to be more conversational, more useful, and smarter than the older experience.

Some of that promise appears to be real. Gemini’s conversational understanding is described as impressive, and the speaker is clearly part of Google’s renewed focus on the smart home. But the overall experience is still marked by slow and unreliable behavior, and several features are paywalled.

There is also an important upgrade question. Gemini for Home works on all Google Home speakers, and testing found mostly the same experience on the Nest Audio, Nest Hub (2nd gen), and Nest Hub Max. That is good for owners of existing hardware because Google is not making the new AI features exclusive to the new speaker. It also weakens the argument for upgrading if an older device is already doing the job.

Who the Google Home Speaker makes sense for

The Google Home Speaker is easiest to recommend as hardware. It looks better than many smart speakers, sounds good for its size, listens well, and adds Matter and Thread support. A pair can also improve TV audio for someone using a Google TV Streamer and basic TV speakers.

It is harder to recommend as a showcase for Gemini. The device may be built for the new assistant, but Gemini for Home is not yet the dependable smart home voice experience the hardware deserves.

That leaves a practical verdict: buy it for the speaker, the design, and the smart home controller features. Do not buy it expecting Gemini for Home to transform the category immediately.