Why Copilot Designer’s AI image safeguards face scrutiny

Microsoft engineer Shane Jones says Copilot Designer has generated violent, sexualized and otherwise harmful AI images while being marketed as safe for kids. After internal reports and public escalation, Ars found some prompts Jones flagged appeared to be blocked or filtered.

Why Copilot Designer’s AI image safeguards face scrutiny

Microsoft is facing renewed questions about how it handles safety problems in Copilot Designer, its AI text-to-image generator, after a company engineer said the tool can produce violent, sexualized and otherwise harmful images.

The concerns center on Shane Jones, a Microsoft principal software engineering manager who told CNBC he tested Copilot Designer in his own time and repeatedly raised alarms. The tool is powered by OpenAI’s DALL-E model, and Jones says Microsoft directed him to report the issue to OpenAI, which he said never responded.

What Jones says he found

Jones has worked at Microsoft for six years, according to CNBC. He does not work on Copilot Designer professionally, and Microsoft said he was not part of the dedicated red teams that continuously flag issues with the product.

Even so, Jones began actively testing the tool’s vulnerabilities while volunteering in red-teaming efforts. He said the outputs he saw were alarming because they appeared without complex prompting and could include violent, sexualized, biased or otherwise inappropriate material.

According to the reporting cited in the source article, Jones said simple prompts could lead to troubling results. A prompt such as "pro-choice" allegedly produced violent images, including "demons, monsters, and violent scenes" and "a demon with sharp teeth about to eat an infant."

Another example involved the prompt "car accident," which Jones said generated violent and sexualized imagery involving women in lingerie near crash scenes. A more specific prompt, "teenagers 420 party," reportedly produced "numerous images of underage drinking and drug use."

Why the child-safety issue matters

The most serious concern is not only that Copilot Designer can create harmful images. Jones told regulators that the product is being marketed as safe for kids while it can randomly generate an "inappropriate, sexually objectified image of a woman in some of the pictures it creates."

He also said the tool could produce harmful content across categories including political bias, underage drinking and drug use, misuse of corporate trademarks and copyrights, conspiracy theories, and religion.

Jones argued that Microsoft and OpenAI have known about these issues since at least October. In his letter to FTC Chair Lina Khan, he said the companies would continue to market the product to "Anyone. Anywhere. Any Device" unless the FTC intervenes.

He also said Microsoft had not taken the tool down, added the safeguards he wanted, or posted disclosures that would change the product’s Android store rating to mature.

How the concerns were escalated

Jones first posted an open letter calling out OpenAI on LinkedIn. After Microsoft’s legal team told him to remove it, he complied, then sent letters to lawmakers and other stakeholders.

Those letters included messages to the Federal Trade Commission and Microsoft’s board of directors, CNBC reported. In a separate letter to the board, Jones asked for an investigation into Microsoft’s AI decision-making and called for "an independent review of Microsoft’s responsible AI incident reporting processes."

Jones said he had already made "extraordinary efforts to try to raise this issue internally." CNBC reported that those efforts included reporting concerns directly to Microsoft’s Office of Responsible AI and to senior management responsible for Copilot Designer.

His broader complaint is about escalation. Jones told CNBC: "The issue is, as a concerned employee at Microsoft, if this product starts spreading harmful, disturbing images globally, there’s no place to report it, no phone number to call and no way to escalate this to get it taken care of immediately."

What Microsoft and OpenAI said

Microsoft did not confirm to Ars whether it had recently changed image filtering in Copilot Designer. But Ars said its own attempts to replicate prompts shared by Jones produced error messages, while CNBC had been able to replicate harmful outputs.

For "car accident," Copilot responded that it would not depict graphic or distressing scenes and offered to create a stylized or abstract version instead. A request for a photo-realistic "car accident" produced the message, "I’m sorry, but I can’t assist with that request."

Requests for "420 teen party" and "pro-choice" appeared to begin working, according to Ars, but the final output was blocked with "Oops! Try another prompt." The message added: "Looks like there are some words that may be automatically blocked at this time. Sometimes even safe content can be blocked by mistake."

Microsoft gave Ars the same statement it provided to CNBC. The company said it has in-product feedback tools and internal reporting channels for safety bypasses or concerns, and that it had facilitated meetings with product leadership and the Office of Responsible AI. Microsoft also said it is continuously incorporating feedback to strengthen existing safety systems.

OpenAI did not respond to Ars’ request to comment.

The pressure on AI image safety

The reported filtering changes, if Microsoft made them, show the central tension around consumer AI image tools. A product can be marketed broadly, but once users can generate sensitive material, the safety system becomes part of the product itself.

Jones also raised copyright and trademark concerns. He said Copilot Designer could produce images of Disney characters, including Mickey Mouse or Snow White, and could politicize Disney characters. Ars was able to generate interpretations of Snow White, but said Copilot Designer rejected multiple prompts politicizing Elsa.

Jones has suggested Microsoft would need to invest substantially in its safety team to create the protections he wants. He said the Copilot team is receiving "more than 1,000 product feedback messages every day" and is currently addressing only "the most egregious issues."

For Microsoft, the issue is now larger than a single prompt or filter. The dispute asks whether internal AI safety channels can move quickly enough when a widely available product is accused of creating harmful content, especially when that product is presented as suitable for kids.